Erich Gliebe
American Dissident Voices

Donations are needed to keep this program on the air. Please give $20 today: Click Here

Subscribe to our unique, thought-provoking magazine National Vanguard.
Only $18 for six high-quality, glossy color issues: Click Here

National Vanguard No. 120



China and a White Future
by Erich Gliebe

American Dissident Voices Broadcast of
August 16, 2008



For all of its oppressing of many of its own people, there can be no doubt that China's leaders have the long-term interest of China firmly fixed in their sights. This message was even implicit in the opening ceremonies of the Olympics.





Hello again, and welcome back to this week's broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance, which is North America's foremost White racialist organization. I'm your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe. Thanks for joining me.

Lately, much of the world has been caught up in the Summer Olympics, which are being held in Beijing, China. The Olympics, whether Summer or Winter, is always a festive event, and this summer's Games are no exception.

Part of the draw for the Summer Games this year is the fact that they are being hosted by China, a somewhat mysterious nation that is home to some 1.3 billion people, or about one-fifth of the entire world population. China remains one of the world's few Communist nations, although its economy is now far more capitalist than ever before. The switchover to a more capitalist economy, coupled with China's absolutely huge population and its large store of natural resources, particularly coal, has made China into an emerging superpower. And for the White race, the really frightful thing about all of this is that there is still a strong flavor of racism that has always been present in China.

Although I didn't see the entire opening ceremonies for this summer's Olympics, I have heard that it was one of the most spectacular performances ever to open the Olympic Games. The few replays that I have seen were certainly outstanding. One of the best reviews I've read that explores the balance between the flash and the phoniness of the opening ceremonies was posted on www.theglobeandmail.com by Geoffrey York. I recommend that article if you have the time.

Anyway, while China's opening ceremonies dazzled just about everyone, some have complained that the estimated $100 million -- possibly as large as $300 million -- in U.S. dollars could have been better spent on China's still-large poor population. York's article gives a high-end figure of $150 million, but -- like many things controlled by the Chinese government -- reliable facts and figures aren't always easy to come by.

Facts and figures published by the U.S. government, while not always entirely accurate -- as in the government's erroneous claim that six million Jews were exterminated by the National Socialists during World War II -- are usually more reliable. And a few of these U.S. government figures make plain that, while a few hundred million dollars may seem like a lot to you and me, it is peanuts to China.

The U.S. trade deficit with China was well over $2 trillion dollars for each of the last two calendar years, 2006 and 2007. What that means is that the value of what the U.S. imported FROM China exceeded in value the exports TO China by two trillion dollars. Now, two trillion dollars is a difficult number to grasp because it doesn't really sound that bad. There is the word "two" in front, and we're all familiar with that, and it's followed by "trillion" which, for most people, sounds a lot like "million" and "billion," and so they don't think too much about it. Well, every so often I like to crunch a few numbers, and so let's see if we can grasp the meaning of a "two trillion dollar a year" trade deficit.

Two trillion dollars amounts to 5.5 billion dollars a day that leaves the U.S. and ends up in China. Based on a U.S. population of 305 million, that breaks down to about $6,580 per year that goes over to China for each and every American -- that's over $26,000 per year for a family of four.

So even if we assume that the opening ceremonies in Beijing set the Chinese government back the equivalent of $300 million U.S. dollars, the Chinese economy would have re-claimed every nickel of that money through from the U.S. in just under… an hour and 20 minutes.

So if there is any complaining to be done about the amount of money the Chinese government spent to dazzle the world at the start of the Olympics, it had better NOT be about the downtrodden millions of poor Chinese whose lives could have been improved with that money. No, the complaining should instead relate to how the former economic independence of the United States has been forfeited to China: why that was done, and who is responsible.

And while we White racialists love to come down hard on the Jews for just about everything, I suspect that much of the blame for the economic emasculation of America must fall in the laps of greedy White men who consciously chose (and continue to choose) money or power over nation, and money or power over race.

Now, I'm not going to let the Jews off the hook here, because there is no denying that they are up to their elbows in the filth of international finance, and have been for over a century. There's no denying that the Jewish media have pushed for the de-industrialization of America and the exportation of jobs to every corner of Asia. And Jews in the political structure have ably managed things to make that transformation possible. In short, the Jewish Establishment has consistently pushed for the economic weakening of America and eagerly embraced the ceding of our economic might to China.

But, of course, Jews are Jews, and it's not really fair for us to expect them to be any different. We should EXPECT them to push for increasing their own profits and shoring up their positions of power in exchange for destroying White economies. That's just par for the course, when it comes to Jews.

The troubling part of the economic and trade disaster is that there are a lot of White men who ALSO are in the filth up to their elbows. Many White businessmen have benefited from the switching over from an industrial economy to an information economy, and that change has potentially dire consequences in terms of long-term national security, but maybe that will be a subject for another day.

Bill Gates, for instance, a White man and the CEO of Microsoft Corporation, has raked in untold billions from this switchover from production to information, and he has "given back" his earnings in many ways, including the Gates Millennium Scholars Program, a scholarship program exclusively for non-Whites. Gates has also given enough computers to Mexican schools such that the Mexican government felt obliged in 2007 to award Gates and his wife Melinda the highest award that can be given to a non-Mexican citizen, the so-called "Aztec Eagle" award.

But White businessmen who sell out their country for profit or who go out of their way to snub their own people aren't the only ones who collaborate with the Jews in implementing the Jewish plan for putting the White race at the mercy of the non-White hordes of the Earth. For decades, White men in positions of political power have sought short-term electoral gains for themselves by sacrificing the long-term good of the race.

For example, while Bill and Melinda Gates received the Aztec Eagle award last year, this year the award went to Massachusetts Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy. The announcement proclaiming Kennedy's award reads, in part -- and I quote -- "He has denounced injustices suffered by immigrants" and "promoted initiatives to promote full political participation and increased access to health and education services for the Mexican-American community," as reported online at theunapologeticmexican.org. Kennedy, you might remember, was one of the architects of last year's infamous piece of legislation, the "Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007," which thankfully failed in the Senate last June. That bill proposed legal status for all of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants currently residing in the United States and would have provided a pathway for them to attain full citizenship. Despite his failure with the Reform Act of 2007, Mexico awarded this year's Aztec Eagle to Kennedy, essentially giving him an "A" for effort and a no-so-subtle wink to the effect of, "We're expecting better results out of you the next time, Teddy-Boy."

And now we get to the crux of the problem with regard to the perilous position of the White race today. It isn't just that non-Whites are looking out for their own interests, as the Jews are, as the Latino writers for theunapologeticmexican are, as the Chinese are, and as every other racial group except Whites is doing. As I've said many times, looking out for one's own interests is the natural behavior for any racial group.

The problem is that there are many Whites who don't put a priority on the race. They've been subjected to loads of Jewish propaganda to the effect that racial diversity is great and the White race is terrible and all of that other crap, but the fact of the matter is that many Whites have made the choice to believe such nonsense. And, as in the case of Bill Gates, Ted Kennedy, and countless others, many Whites are active in helping non-Whites while ignoring the needs of their own people.

Ignoring the needs of one's own people: that's one thing the Chinese DON'T do. Sure, the Chinese government has pushed industrialization in China to the point where many Chinese civilians suffer from respiratory problems related to the air pollution emitted by coal-burning power plants and steelworks.

Sure, the Chinese government doesn't tolerate dissent and therefore has a rather dismal civil rights record, at least in the eyes of much of the West. You might have noted that those who do all of President Bush's thinking for him told him, during his visit to Beijing to watch the Olympics, to make sure he comments about the lack of freedom in China. But that's beside the point.

The point is that, for all of its oppressing of many of its own people, there can be no doubt that China's leaders have the long-term interest of China firmly fixed in their sights. China's massive industrialization over the last forty years, its nuclear capabilities, and now its forays into space all deliver the same message: "We intend to build China into a nation that no power in the world can rein in." That message is implicit in every action taken by the Chinese government and, from what I've seen, that message was implicit in the opening ceremonies of the Olympics as well.

The great advantage that the Chinese have over the White West in emerging as the dominant power over the next couple of decades is its racial homogeneity. My critics will claim that China is as diverse a nation as any and possibly more so, with all of its various dialects and different ethnicities. But the various ethnic groups in China are related to each other as are Whites who are German, British, Italian, and Russian: they are all from the same gene pool, and the differences are relatively insignificant. That's why the National Alliance promotes a White homeland that would welcome Whites of any ethnicity; it is the race that matters most, and a White homeland with Swedes, Slovaks, Swiss, and Serbs would be -- in our view -- racially homogeneous. That's the situation that the Chinese enjoy today: racial homogeneity, and it is one of the sources of the strength of China.

At the same time, it is the main source of weakness of the West. For every corrupt White man out there like Bill Gates or Ted Kennedy, there are a thousand others who would gladly do everything they could to contribute to the well-being of the race. The problem is that they live in a society in which the flow of information is controlled by the Jews, for one thing, and for another, racial diversity seems to just be "the way things are" and so they don't even consider what it would be like to live in a homogeneous White nation.

That's a problem: In order for most Whites to see the need for a White racial homeland, we need to show them how much better things are in such a homeland. But we don't have one. It's a Catch-22: In order to convince people they need to create a White homeland, they have to see it in action -- they have to see it really working. But we can't show it really working for the obvious reason that we don't have it.

Where does that leave us? It leaves us White racialists -- those of us who SEE where our race is headed and who UNDERSTAND what that means, in a historical sense -- it leaves us with the task of bringing the truth to the rest of our kinsmen. In the National Alliance, we have a program for doing that, and you ought to consider joining us in our efforts.

There is no one to do it but us. Let's turn things around while we still can.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.


The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.

The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. This information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.

To contact us please write to:

National Vanguard Books
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946

Donations are needed to keep this program on the air. Please give $20 today: Click Here



[Main Page | Whats New | Who Rules America | Catalog ]

© 2008 National Alliance, P.O. Box 90, Hillsboro, WV 24946