Who is an Alliance member and who is mainstream?
Hello again, and welcome back to this week's broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance, which is North America's foremost White racialist organization. I'm your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe. Thanks for joining me.
Today's broadcast is the speech I delivered at the National Alliance's East Coast regional conference held on August 9th in Maryland.
Thank you all for being here today. I hope that this conference will help our organization rejuvenate racial activism in the Baltimore-Washington area as well as up and down the East Coast.
The forces that oppose the Alliance are well-entrenched and very strong. Furthermore, they are strongly motivated to keep their hands on the power that they wield in the media and in the government. After all, they are calling the shots; things are going the way they want them to, and the last thing they need is for a White racialist worldview to assume the reins of power and re-shape society along racialist lines. And so the Jews and our other enemies are intent on keeping us down.
That puts us in the position of being something of a rebel group, in the sense that we intend to wipe out the existing foundations of this egoist, materialist society and replace them with new foundations. That's the attitude that we've always had in the Alliance; it is essentially what Dr. Pierce meant when he talked of the Alliance being a "radical" group. During the 1960s, Dr. Pierce's own thinking was radicalized, and he formed a radical organization that, he hoped, would attract radical Whites who were willing to work as a team to achieve a society that was, not coincidentally, radically different from the one we have now. So the Alliance is a radical organization made up of radical people who are not at all in the mainstream.
On the surface, of course, many Alliance members appear to be squarely within the mainstream. Many of you fit that description. You have regular jobs, families, a pet and a mini-van, and you attend community events and associate easily with people in the mainstream. You appear to accept much of what is happening in the world today without too much trouble. In short, you fit in.
But on the inside, you've got the irresistible conviction that the multiracialism that afflicts our society and the Jews' use of power to coerce everyone into doing and believing what the Jews want them to do and believe… is wrong. You believe, as do I, that our race is special, that it is worth preserving, and that the only way for that to happen is for us to separate the White race from the rest of humanity. You don't see the racial mixing that has destroyed so much of our race as having been of any benefit to us. So separation is the best answer we have at this time, and the National Alliance is an organization devoted to building that answer in concrete form. That's why you joined the Alliance and that's why you are here today.
It's easy to see, then, how it is that Alliance members seem to fit in with the mainstream society and yet still be radicals. We have essentially the same needs as every other human being: we need enough money to pay for essentials and maybe a little more; we like to spend time with friends and have a few laughs; we like to get things done and do them well; we like to have control over our personal lives; and so on. All of this we share with most, if not all, mainstream Whites.
The difference between us and mainstream Whites is in our perception of what is really important in the overall scheme of things. For us, the integrity of our race is most important, as is our power to control our own racial destiny. In other words, our perspective is group-oriented or team-oriented, and it is a long-term perspective.
Mainstream Whites think otherwise. For most of them, it is the individual and not the group that is most important. And for most of them, it is the short term and not the long term that is most important. Despite all of the other needs and wants that we share with mainstreamers, this difference sets us apart from them. And in a way, it sets us ABOVE them, in the sense that our purposes are more noble than theirs: We want what is best for an entire race, while they want only what is best for themselves.
Many mainstream Whites would disagree with my previous points; in fact, most of them would, which is why they are in the mainstream and not among us racialists. Some of those mainstream Whites will object that my categorizing their thinking and acting as short-term is inaccurate. They live their lives today, they say, with the long term always in mind. Usually, this means that they believe in some sort of conscious afterlife that lasts an eternity, and they believe that the actions they take now will determine the pleasantness (or lack thereof) of that afterlife.
My response to that claim would be, first, that that is a completely selfish frame of mind. Secondly, their worldview doesn't in any way benefit the long-term security of the race that endowed them with all that they are. Ignoring one's race and focusing on getting oneself a ticket to heaven isn't a very considerate way of expressing one's thanks to the race that gave one the gifts he has. Certainly, your religious beliefs are between you and your Maker, but unless there is a commitment to the long-term security and progress of the White race somewhere in those beliefs, you're going to be severely hamstrung in helping our people to survive.
But besides the shortsighted issue, more people will probably disagree with my claim that they act only for their own ends; in other words, they act selfishly. Most mainstream Whites will strongly deny this accusation, and instead they point their fingers at US and say that WE are selfish because we only want what's best for the White race, and that we don't care about the rest of humanity.
There is some truth to that counter-accusation, of course. We DO care more about Whites than about others. There are a couple of reasons for this. One is that we ourselves are Whites, and so we naturally tend to favor our own above others. Another is that we are intelligent enough to realize that the one racial group that is getting shanked in the modern world is the White race and, because of that, we tend to want to help out the one who is down-and-out. This is the sort of reasoning that moves people to donate time and money to help this or that endangered species; the fear of losing some type of organism for good gets some people off their duffs and moving.
Both of these factors come into play for us, and they give White racialists some strong motivation to advocate for and fight for our race. That doesn't necessarily mean that we have no concern at all for other races, it just means that helping the non-White races isn't a mission priority. If your spouse is diagnosed with an aggressive and potentially fatal form of cancer, do you give much thought to the needs of the neighbors? Obviously, no; the neighbors are going to have to fend for themselves a while, as you do whatever you can to help your spouse work through a life-threatening illness.
That's the position we White racialists are in with regard to our views on White people as compared to non-Whites: we are trying to work our race through a life-threatening illness. Call it what you will -- liberalism, misplaced altruism, other-worldly religion -- it is a life-threatening illness. Our race is on the ropes; what we do or fail to do will mean the difference between a brighter or dimmer future for our people. In that light, our concern for non-Whites takes a back burner to our concern for our kinsmen.
Many one-world Whites out there look at our willingness to work only for the needs of our race and they claim to themselves and to everyone else that this preference is a moral liability. They see themselves as "more moral" than we are, since they show no preference to anyone with regard to race; they treat everyone equally. For example, they demonstrate on behalf of illegal Mexican immigrants, and they believe strongly in affirmative-action and scholarships for non-Whites. In their minds, that's morally consistent, and they feel that treating everyone equally will serve to make things better for everyone, Whites as well as non-Whites.
Well, the weakness in the one-worlders' argument is that everything they are doing is only serving to create more and more long-term friction and conflict in the world; it isn't doing anything to make the future of any race better or more peaceful. In the short run, it may seem that to be "nice" and "accepting" should serve to make the world better and more peaceful in the long run. There is no evidence to support such a claim; everywhere that races intermingle, racial tension and conflict follow in very short order. On the contrary, stable societies tend to be ones that are racially homogeneous. So you see that our concern for only the White race is actually beneficial to other races, too, although that isn't a primary goal for us and is in reality just a collateral effect.
So we are radical racialists who wish to redirect the path down which our race is headed. The Establishment opposes us and thus, by default, we are essentially rebels. Historically, there has been a strong spirit of rebellion here in the Baltimore area. During the War of 1812, so strong was the anti-British sentiment here that the British dubbed Baltimore to be a "nest of pirates." Fort McHenry, which isn't far from here, was bombarded all night by the British gunboats during that war. The fort held, thus giving Francis Scott Keys the inspiration for writing what eventually became the American national anthem, "The Star Spangled Banner."
Later, during the Civil War, when the Union invaded Maryland in order to keep the state from seceding as well as to prevent Washington, D.C. from being completely surrounded by Confederate-held territory, there were riots throughout Baltimore. The Union troops sent in were greeted with a good dose of the secessionist sentiment that was held by much of the populace. President Lincoln took a hard line against the uprising, and the rights of many Marylanders were trampled as order was restored. Many citizens were thrown in jail and held without due cause, a move that Lincoln would have taken a lot more crap for if he hadn't been killed right after the war.
My point here is not to pass judgment on Abraham Lincoln or state definitively who was right and who was wrong in the Civil War. It is, rather, that a historical spirit of rebellion runs through this area and all throughout the East Coast. From the thirteen Colonies of the American Revolution to the battles against the forces of racial integration, there is a strong sentiment here that says, "We don't like to be told what to do."
Well, a group of people is telling you what to do and they're telling you what to think. They are flooding the country with non-Whites, which guarantees that the White gene pool will become more and more dilute over time as race-mixing accelerates. You have two choices: fight back, or go along with it.
And you know what? That's the choice that every White man and woman in the world has, too.
If you're here today, you have chosen to fight. Most Whites haven't, yet. There are several reasons for that: some aren't aware of the facts about race, some have been brainwashed by the Jewish media, and some are basically on our side but need a little encouragement to jump in with both feet.
It is the job of those of us who have chosen to fight to reach out to the rest of our kinsmen, especially -- first -- the ones of high quality. There are many such Whites like that in the Baltimore-Washington area: intelligent, hard-working, and a bit daring. Most of these have their ducks in a row, and an increasing number of them are becoming either bored with the status quo or worried about what kind of a future lies ahead. It is our task to show them our vision of a White future and to inspire them to join forces with us and to organize with us. That's the only way we have a chance to radically re-structure society along racialist lines. And THAT is the only way our people will have any kind of a future.
I hope you make the choice to be a conscious and productive part of the Alliance's Cause. Thank you.
I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.
