Anti-war protesters at the Republican National Convention





Hello again, and welcome back to this week's edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America's foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I'm your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Now that Republican presidential nominee John McCain has chosen Alaska governor Sarah Palin to be his running mate in November, the lines are now officially drawn in the sand. With McCain and Palin on the Republican side, and Barack Obama and Joseph Biden on the Democratic ticket, it is sure to be an ugly and dirty campaign.

As always in the Alliance, every time an election comes around, we aren't looking for ways to influence the election or help one candidate get elected over another. Remember that mass democracy flies in the face of the Alliance's principle that says that the masses of the people lack the ability to make decisions for the good of the larger group. Even if they could make such hard decisions, the masses lack the toughness and willpower to follow those decisions through to the end. For us, the masses are a necessary and stabilizing force in society; unfortunately, in a day and age when our race is in need of drastic changes rather than stability, the masses tend to stay put when we want to move.

So the masses have a lot of inertia. And while the bad news is that when the masses are staying put, it is very difficult to get them moving, the flip side of the coin is that once they begin moving, they tend to keep moving. In other words, if we could somehow get the White masses moving in our direction, we might be able to put into effect some changes throughout society that the Jews would be none too happy about and that would set us on our way to a new White nation.

I'm not going to suggest what those changes might be. To start thinking about those things before the masses start to grind out of the ruts of multiracialism in which they are now mired is to put the cart before the horse. But what I would like to suggest here is that the 2008 Presidential campaign and the election itself offer Our Cause a chance to grow and flourish.

The campaign is bound to be very divisive. On the one hand is Barack Obama, the first Black man to ever be up for the nation's highest office. Virtually every Black voter in America will vote for Obama; for them, this campaign will be all about race. And because of that, there are going to be a large number of White people who will begin thinking more seriously about race. Not that they will become hardcore White racialists overnight, but when they watch the news and see the throngs of Blacks cheering and dancing for Obama, many of them will -- at some level -- recognize the power and unity of race and wish that there was a White candidate who stood for the pride and uniqueness of our people.

Then there is the question of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite a significant fraction of the White American public vehemently opposing the wars, John McCain is all for continuing them, with no end in sight. Those White Americans, who joyfully supported Barack Obama earlier this year when he was "talking tough" about bringing the troops home as soon as possible, are now disappointed that Obama has slowly and quietly backed away from his hard-line stance on the wars. Now, he favors some sort of nebulous gradual reduction in troops, which is essentially no different than what every other waffling politician has advocated since all of George W. Bush's lies about getting us into the war came to light. Obviously, the Jews -- who are interested in keeping the American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan as a deterrent against Iran attacking Israel -- have latched themselves firmly onto Obama's ear, an event that I had suggested might happen in one of my American Dissident Voices broadcasts earlier this year. Who do these disenchanted White Americans vote for now, the White war hawk or the Black war waffler?

Finally, John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin as his running mate has raised serious questions about his ability to make good decisions. I don't care if she was president of the school PTA; I don't care if she was the mayor of a town of 9,000 residents; I don't care if she was governor of a state with the same population of San Antonio, Texas. She isn't qualified to be the nation's Chief Executive. And when John McCain was asked by a reporter if Sarah Palin was definitely the most qualified person in the entire Republican Party to be his running mate for president, he lied and said that she was.

But as limited as Sarah Palin's credentials are, she certainly appears to be more qualified than Barack Obama, who hasn't accomplished anything noteworthy during his time in public office.

So again we come back to the question: Who do the thinking White voters back in the campaign? This presents us in the Alliance with an opportunity. There are many cracks in the pavement, and this campaign will make many more. We need to help those cracks to spread and to widen in order that this society give way to a new, White homeland.

In the meantime, I will stick to my contention -- which I had made in a broadcast earlier this summer -- that the best possible scenario for us in November, is if McCain wins a close election by a nose and all of the Obama supporters feel cheated. Perhaps if McCain wins the electoral vote with Obama winning the popular vote, non-Whites will react by burning down their neighborhoods and going on killing rampages as happened in 1992 after the infamous Rodney King verdict in Los Angeles. The '92 LA Riots were probably the best recruiting period in National Alliance history, as White racial consciousness was immediately raised when Blacks began pulling White people out of cars at random and beating and killing them. Who can forget the ghastly image of White trucker Reginald Denny being pulled from the cab of his truck and being beaten in the head with a cinder block and the Black perpetrators celebrating over his bloody body?

Some White racialists have expressed thoughts that an Obama presidency would actually help bring us new recruits, as some of the White citizenry would take exception to having a non-White holding the nation's highest office. Now in some cases, that may be true. But as apathetic and racially uneducated as most White Americans are, I just don't see having even a Black president as being enough to awaken the Whites en masse and reacting in a positive manner. Non-Whites on the other hand, have demonstrated time and time again that they are very racially conscious and very reactionary.

But as complacent as White Americans are, I do see many of them waking up and reacting if they see non-Whites looting and rampaging following a McCain victory. And a four-year McCain presidency is a long time for the non-White Obama supporters to stew and boil over.

And for all of our White activists listening today: keep your nose to the grindstone and keep up the hard work. We could see some substantial dividends over the next year.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.