Mahmoud Ahmadinejad





Hello, and welcome to this week's edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America's foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I'm your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

With George W. Bush steering the ship of state over the last eight years, it seems to me that there has been a changed attitude throughout the rest of the world in regard to how the United States is viewed. That changing attitude is perhaps best summed up in the question that is the title of this broadcast: "What are you going to do about it?"

That attitude has been around for quite a while, of course -- since at least the middle of the last century. Hitler took that attitude toward the rest of Western Europe and America when he began annexing regions around Germany that had either been stolen from her after the First World War or because their populations were overwhelmingly of German ancestry and were therefore eager to be included in the Third Reich. When the United States and Britain essentially gave Hitler the silent nod of approval in unifying the Germans throughout Europe, he mistakenly assumed that they understood what a good thing a unified Germany would be in the defense of White Europe against Communism. And when Hitler carried his conviction to its logical conclusion by invading the Soviet Union in an effort to destroy the communist beast at its roots, Britain and France raised their feeble hands in protest. France surrendered within the space of two months and Britain, had it not been an island nation and not been supplied with war imports from the United States, would have caved in in short order.

The British claim that they didn't fall to Germany in the Battle of Britain because of the great fighting spirit of the British people. There is no doubt some truth to that argument, for the various tribes and ethnicities that melded into the British people have a long tradition of martial ardor.

But possibly the biggest reason Britain didn't fall in 1940 was that Hitler didn't really want to destroy the British Empire anyway, and he didn't put every ounce of Germany's fighting strength into the effort. He canceled Operation Sea Lion, the planned invasion of the British Isles, and settled for an aerial war that everyone knew would not break the spirit of Britain. Rather, the nightly bombings of London by the Luftwaffe were meant to bide time until Germany's aggressive assault on the Soviet Union -- code-named Operation Barbarossa -- reaped the expected successes. Once that anticipated success became a reality, the hope among Hitler's inner circle was that Britain would see the light and become a partner with National Socialist Germany. Unfortunately for the White race, none of this worked out as Hitler had planned: the invasion against Stalin ground to a halt from the unforgiving winter and Britain spurned Germany's pleas for a British-German alliance until the United States came into the war, and that made it pretty easy for Churchill and the other bluebloods to decide which horse to back from that point on.

Hitler, of course, knew very well the biological connection between the Germans and the British, and had stated long before in Mein Kampf that not only did he want to stamp out communism and expand the borders of Germany to the east, but also that he wanted an alliance between the greatest navy in the world -- Britain's -- and the greatest army in the world -- Germany's.

So it is no wonder that Hitler's war against Britain was always a bit half-hearted. Even to the very end of the war, as the Soviet tanks roared towards Berlin and the Red Army -- encouraged by the Soviet propagandist, the Jew Ilya Ehrenburg -- was going on probably the most horrific raping and killing rampage in modern history throughout the conquered territories, Hitler believed that the British and Americans would see the light about the rightness of his cause and turn against the Soviet monster.

Mainstream historians have always been a bit perplexed by the flight to Britain of Deputy Fuhrer Rudolf Hess, a close friend of Hitler's and a member of his inner circle. In May of 1940, shortly before the launching of Germany's Operation Barbarossa against the USSR, Hess flew solo to the British Isles, parachuting down safely in Scotland and letting his plane crash. After his arrest, he made a last attempt to negotiate an alliance between Germany and Britain. When it was made public what Hess had done and that the British government sneered at Hess's offer of peace, Hitler claimed that Hess had acted on his own, without authorization from himself or the German government. Hess was examined and, at various times, declared mentally incompetent by British shrink-doctors, which further supported the widely-held view that Hess had become a loose cannon and done what he had all on his own.

In reality, Hitler and Hess had come to an agreement prior to Hess's flight, to the effect that if the negotiations didn't go as planned, Hess would essentially be a sacrificial lamb. In order to protect the honor of Germany, Hess would get no support from his country if his mission failed. And that was exactly what happened; Churchill was so intent on being a war-dog, trying to one-up the other great Germanic nation of Europe and its dynamic and resourceful leader, that he was blind to the logic of a German-British alliance. When the British press and later the international press began to ridicule Hess and claim that he was insane, Hitler had no choice but to hang his good friend out to dry. It was a hard sacrifice for Hitler to make, but he chose his country over his own friendship, as any great leader must do. Hess well knew the risks he was taking in accepting that daring and dangerous mission, and it is a credit to him that he remained faithful to his country throughout the 47 long years of his imprisonment.

This isn't the place to go into all of the details about the injustices committed against Rudolf Hess by the British authorities between 1940 and Hess's mysterious death that was ruled a suicide in 1987. The point here is that Hitler did everything he could to hammer out an alliance with Britain.

Alas, it was not to be, but there can be no doubt that Hitler dared greatly, calling the bluff of the West at every turn. Unfortunately for Hitler and for the entire White race, the misguided West, steered by the Jewish string pullers and their Gentile puppets, answered the call, destroyed Hitler and the Third Reich, and put our race on the road we remain on today, with our present chaotic and our future uncertain. Hitler asked, "What are you going to do about it?" and paid for it fully.

But there have been many others besides Hitler who have had that attitude of "What are you going to do about it?" towards the United States. The United States had military advisors in Vietnam long before the U.S. government ever acknowledged a presence there. Vietnam's communists knew that if they made a bid to take over their whole country, it was possible that the U.S. would become involved far beyond sending military advisors and a little military equipment. But they were willing to take that chance; in essence, they challenged America: "What are you going to do about it?"

I and the other members of the National Alliance believe that no nation can make the correct long-term decisions unless it is guided by a worldview that is based on a knowledge and appreciation of racial realities. Of course, by the time the conflict in Vietnam flared up, America had long since given up any worldview committed to the progress and survival of the White race. And so it was no surprise to racialist thinkers at the time like Drs. William Pierce and Revilo Oliver that the U.S. would send hundreds of thousands of White men and others through the meat-grinder in an effort to help one group of little yellow people with one ideology against another group of little yellow people with another ideology in the backwoods of Asia. The move to send American troops en masse into Vietnam made perfect nonsense to White racialist thinkers, but that didn't stop those posturing as America's leaders at the time to waste the lives of White men and the wealth of the United States in fighting over a bit of god-forsaken turf in the orient.

So, the Vietnamese communists asked, "What are you going to do about it?" and stupid Uncle Sam sent in the grunts to die. And after more than a decade of wasted time, wasted money, and wasted lives, Uncle Sam finally left, convinced (at least publicly) that the war had been fought to a stalemate. Of course, about a year later, South Vietnam fell to the communists just as the North had done long before, making vain every sacrifice made by the White men who were sent to Vietnam against their will. Unlike Hitler, who lost when he challenged the U.S., the Vietnamese won.

Other examples could be given. Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in the early 1990s and was thrown back. Slobodan Milosevic thumbed his nose at the West a few years later in trying to establish a Serbia for Serbs and he, too, came out on the losing end of a tussle with the United States.

But the era of America being able to bitch-slap the rest of the world into submission is over. The vogue now, for nations both strong and weak, is to do exactly what you please and dare the United States to come after you. Israel has been doing this ever since its inception, but that's because the power of the Jewish Establishment in the U.S. is so strong that everyone knows that Uncle Sam never puts up the staying hand to Israel. If it ever did, at least half of the adult population in the U.S. would either die of surprise or have to receive medical attention for shock. China, too, has long relied on its geographical separation from the U.S. and the strength of its massive population to challenge or snub the U.S. as it sees fit.

Over the last couple of decades, though, in a trend that seems to be accelerating in the last years of the Bush Administration, every piss-ant nation in every corner of the globe appears to be unafraid to stand up to the Jews' bully boy.

Mexico sends its wretched refuse north without so much as a "by your leave," and is now to the point of DEMANDING certain conditions in negotiations about immigration between the U.S. and Mexico.

India, now that it is more industrialized than in the past and boasts the world's second-largest population -- now not far behind China's -- is also feeling its strength. Its confidence in itself is shown by its decisions to heed or ignore, as it sees fit, the advice of America's leaders.

Russia, in its recent episode in the former Soviet state of Georgia, completely ignored the "demands" of Condoleezza Rice and President Bush and did exactly what it pleased.

And of course Public Enemy Number One, that allegedly nasty and vicious leader of Iran, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, pays no heed to the saber-rattling of President Bush and the kennel full of Jews that he listens to in forming and promoting policy.

North Korea, Cuba, Pakistan, and Venezuela, too, are other nations who could give a rip what the U.S. wants or says. "What are you going to do about it?" is the common mantra of everyone who sees that the U.S. doesn't have the will to enforce its demands any longer.

Of course, Saddam Hussein didn't give President Bush the time of day, and we sure showed him. Or did we? Who is going to have the last laugh in Iraq? Are we, as Bush assures, on the verge of victory? It seems to me that victory in Iraq is almost impossible to DEFINE, much less ACHIEVE.

Anyway, on one level, it bothers me that every puny nation and every warlord with an inflated ego can get away with snubbing the United States. It's a dangerous world out there for Americans, and I don't relish the thought of the entire world hating the U.S. and ganging up on it, especially when that coalition is nearly entirely non-White.

But on another level, we've had it coming. This bossing-around business has been going on too long, and it's really too bad that it has taken such a long time to finally become ineffective. Had it been ineffective back during the Second World War, the world would be a Whiter, brighter, and happier place.

And you know what? The other good thing is that I and everyone else listening to or reading this broadcast isn't a part of that corrupt and decadent System that operates the U.S. for its own selfish ends. We are part of a new body, a new force, whose purpose is to save our race and put it once again on a sound and secure footing. And the existing System has to die in order for that to happen.

So if Hugo Chavez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Osama Bin Laden take potshots at Bush, his Jewish cronies, and the whole corrupt U.S. government, I'll raise my glass to them. If they have the guts to mock the U.S. with calls of "What are you going to do about it?", then more power to them, because only with the fall of the existing System can our race survive.

And now I ask you: "What are you going to do about it?" Join the National Alliance and help prepare the future of the White race.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.